This week the world commemorates the anniversary of the sinking of The Titanic. It is hoped that more diligence will be employed in relating its history accurately during this centennial, not the butchered version offered by writer-director James Cameron in his film, "Titanic."
There were too many historical flaws in his film to include here. The most egregious assault was the totally false portrayal of Lieutenant William McMaster Murdoch, the officer in charge during that tragic night. Cameron portrayed him as an incompetent and a coward who pushed others aside, actually pulled his pistol and shot a man in order to get on a lifeboat to save himself.
A total LIE! Lt. Murdock spent the last moments of his life getting reluctant passengers on lifeboats, women and children first, then men, and stayed on duty until he perished in the icy waters as the giant ship sank.
This absolutely false portrayal was distressful for the family and descendants of Lieutenant.Murdoch. This 'history' will remain embedded in the public's consciousness including Murdoch being seen as a murderer.
To kill a man's good name, to deliberately slander and libel a fine gentleman officer, a heroic one at that, who saved others at the cost of his own life is unthinkable and criminal.
So how did Cameron make amends for slaughtering the reputation of a beloved family member? Why he donated 5000 pounds to the Lt. Murdoch Memorial Fund which of course, made everything right.
The movie with its spectacular special effects was a blockbuster which no doubt will be extra gripping with the new just-released 3-D version. But Mr. Cameron should have presented this as a story based on the sinking of the Titanic, not as a real account nor with the real names of Titanic officers in his fictionalized version of history.